![]() Given the importance of and the repeated call for longitudinal studies to investigate work, aging, and retirement-related phenomena (e.g., Fisher, Chaffee, & Sonnega, 2016 Wang, Henkens, & van Solinge, 2011), there is a need for more nontechnical discussions of the relevant conceptual and methodological issues. ![]() This echoes the trend in more general research on work and organizational phenomena, where the discussion of time and longitudinal designs has evolved from explicating conceptual and methodological issues involved in the assessment of changes over time (e.g., McGrath & Rotchford, 1983) to the development and application of data analytic techniques (e.g., Chan, 1998 Chan & Schmitt, 2000 DeShon, 2012 Liu, Mo, Song, & Wang, 2016 Wang & Bodner, 2007 Wang & Chan, 2011 Wang, Zhou, & Zhang, 2016), theory rendering (e.g., Ancona et al., 2001 Mitchell & James, 2001 Vancouver, Tamanini, & Yoder, 2010 Wang et al., 2016), and methodological decisions in conducting longitudinal research (e.g., Beal, 2015 Bolger, Davis, & Rafaeli, 2003 Ployhart & Vandenberg, 2010). An important meta-trend in work, aging, and retirement research is the heightened appreciation of the temporal nature of the phenomena under investigation and the important role that longitudinal study designs play in understanding them (e.g., Heybroek, Haynes, & Baxter, 2015 Madero-Cabib, Gauthier, & Le Goff, 2016 Wang, 2007 Warren, 2015 Weikamp & Göritz, 2015).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |